But is it really "tearing America apart "?I don't think so. The victims of the anti white legal and moral crusade are mute/muted and accept their fate. The millions upon millions of white whose lives have been compromised, harmed and lost altogether because of this are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Referencing the US military having less white males and having to rely on less proficient minorities instead hardly matters when the only "enemy" is Russia .A country whose military performance in its fight with Ukraine makes it even worse than Ethiopia was in its wars with Eritrea.The idea that China is also the enemy too is shadowpuppetry .China has committed systematic human rights violations in Tibet, Xingiang and Hong Kong but the west ie the US doesn't care as all they want/need/expect from the CCP run China is trade.Taiwan is the obvious counter to that but while Russia is being degraded to the benefit of both the west and the east right now any potential conflict over it is a way off. The title Unprotected Class begs an obvious question whether there could there be any way to respond. In the history of the Anglosphere we can see how the Catholic peasants of late 19th century Ireland would certainly qualify as an unprotected class. And in one of the many thousands of cases of evictions a County Mayo community's response was to withdraw their cooperation with the offending landlord in question Captain Boycott whose name of course has entered the English language. This tactic of" boycotting" wasn't entirely new though as the American rebels applied it to British goods in the lead up to the War of Independence. It seems that only a certain Scott Adams did in a way come close to this concept with his "keep the f**k away" advice for whites burdened by the black presence a while back. Initially ironic considering it was coming from a classic liberal.
The titles refers to the term in civil rights legislation, "protected class", which refers to a category, (racial, ethnic, or even sexual minority), which receives some kind of legal protection. Whites receive none, thus the name.
The strategy to fix this isn't simply grassroots stuff, although some element of that is starting to exist. The solution is to completely dissolve most or all of the Civil Rights Act.
As far as the claim that no one will do anything about this, American whites are starting to wake up, albeit slowly.
Bidens Democrat regime's decision to flood the US with 10 million illegals was made to speed up the reduction in the white population to below 50 %and neutralise the MAGA voting cohort in elections if not immediately then shortly. It was an anti white nuclear strike. The Civil Rights Act is the energy source for this and you're absolutely correct about the solution being its dissolution. But I don't think that even this conservative majority SCOTUS would seriously take the action necessary as was shown in the Stanford decision.
But is it really "tearing America apart "?I don't think so. The victims of the anti white legal and moral crusade are mute/muted and accept their fate. The millions upon millions of white whose lives have been compromised, harmed and lost altogether because of this are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Referencing the US military having less white males and having to rely on less proficient minorities instead hardly matters when the only "enemy" is Russia .A country whose military performance in its fight with Ukraine makes it even worse than Ethiopia was in its wars with Eritrea.The idea that China is also the enemy too is shadowpuppetry .China has committed systematic human rights violations in Tibet, Xingiang and Hong Kong but the west ie the US doesn't care as all they want/need/expect from the CCP run China is trade.Taiwan is the obvious counter to that but while Russia is being degraded to the benefit of both the west and the east right now any potential conflict over it is a way off. The title Unprotected Class begs an obvious question whether there could there be any way to respond. In the history of the Anglosphere we can see how the Catholic peasants of late 19th century Ireland would certainly qualify as an unprotected class. And in one of the many thousands of cases of evictions a County Mayo community's response was to withdraw their cooperation with the offending landlord in question Captain Boycott whose name of course has entered the English language. This tactic of" boycotting" wasn't entirely new though as the American rebels applied it to British goods in the lead up to the War of Independence. It seems that only a certain Scott Adams did in a way come close to this concept with his "keep the f**k away" advice for whites burdened by the black presence a while back. Initially ironic considering it was coming from a classic liberal.
The titles refers to the term in civil rights legislation, "protected class", which refers to a category, (racial, ethnic, or even sexual minority), which receives some kind of legal protection. Whites receive none, thus the name.
The strategy to fix this isn't simply grassroots stuff, although some element of that is starting to exist. The solution is to completely dissolve most or all of the Civil Rights Act.
As far as the claim that no one will do anything about this, American whites are starting to wake up, albeit slowly.
Bidens Democrat regime's decision to flood the US with 10 million illegals was made to speed up the reduction in the white population to below 50 %and neutralise the MAGA voting cohort in elections if not immediately then shortly. It was an anti white nuclear strike. The Civil Rights Act is the energy source for this and you're absolutely correct about the solution being its dissolution. But I don't think that even this conservative majority SCOTUS would seriously take the action necessary as was shown in the Stanford decision.